<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Laptop Review</title>
	<link>http://laptopreview.blogsome.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>
	<language>en</language>

		<item>
		<title>Sony VAIO C Review</title>
		<link>http://laptopreview.blogsome.com/2007/09/11/sony-vaio-c-review/</link>
		<comments>http://laptopreview.blogsome.com/2007/09/11/sony-vaio-c-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Laptop Sony Vaio</category>
		<guid>http://laptopreview.blogsome.com/2007/09/11/sony-vaio-c-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	The recently introduced Sony VAIO C Series laptop sports an Intel Core 2 Duo processor, 13.3&quot; widescreen display, features sleek styling with a selection of colors and starts at about $1,099. That description sounds suspiciously like the Apple MacBook, and there&#8217;s no doubt Sony is trying to take a bite out of Apple&#8217;s recent success [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><font><strong>The recently introduced Sony VAIO C Series laptop sports an Intel Core 2 Duo processor, 13.3&quot; widescreen display, features sleek styling with a selection of colors and starts at about $1,099. That description sounds suspiciously like the Apple MacBook, and there&#8217;s no doubt Sony is trying to take a bite out of Apple&#8217;s recent success in the portable notebook market space with the VAIO C</strong></font></p>
	<p><span><br />
<p align="justify"><strong><font>Overview</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>The Sony VAIO C comes in a number of configurations and colors. You can configure a VAIO C online at SonyStyle.com or buy a stock configuration from various retailers. When you configure the VAIO VGN-C190 at SonyStyle.com you have a dizzying array of colors to choose from (Green storm, Pink swirl, Angel, Red storm, Blue streaks, Urban Gray, Spring Green, Blush Pink, Espresso Black, Sea Shell White). Sony also offers a free 60 character engraving in the top left side of the screen &#8212; I don&#8217;t recommend this if you want to protect resale value of your notebook though. </font></p>
	<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="400" height="321" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/18599.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>Sony offers a free 2-line 30 character per line engraving on your VAIO C190 notebook if you configure online (view large image)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>Processor wise you can choose either a cheapy Intel Celeron processor for the VAIO C or select from the full range of Core 2 Duo processors (from the Intel T5500 1.66GHz Core 2 Duo up to the T7600 2.33GHz Core 2 Duo). The only screen offering is the 13.3&quot; WXGA and the base amount of RAM is 1GB, since this notebook is being touted as &quot;Vista Compatible&quot; Sony made a wise decision here. Built-in wireless 802.11 a/b/g is standard. Finally you can choose from a range of 40GB - 120GB hard drives and have the choice between a DVD burner (dual-layer) or a more basic CD Burner / DVD optical drive.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>For this review we&#8217;re taking a look at the Sony VAIO VGN-C140G/B that was purchased for $1,179.99 before rebate from Amazon.com, but after a mail-in rebate of $100 that price gets knocked down to $1,079.99. Following are the specs for the notebook under review:</font></p>
	<ul>
<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Screen: 13.3-inch screen WXGA (1280 x 800) with XBRITE-ECO (glossy finish)</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Color: Espresso Black with copper accents</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Processor: 1.66 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo T5500</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Hard Drive: 120 GB hard drive (SATA, 5400RPM)</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Memory: 1 GB RAM (PC4200, 533 MHz, DDR2 SDRAM, 2 x 512 MB) &#8212; 2 GB max memory</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Optical Drive: multi-format/dual-layer DVD/CD burner</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Ports and Slots: Two USB 2.0, one FireWire 400 port, one ExpressCard 34, one S-Video, memory card reader adapter, headphone / line-out, microphone-in, modem, 10/100 Ethernet</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Wireless: Tri-mode Wi-Fi (802.11a/b/g)</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Graphics: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 (128 MB of shared RAM)</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Operating System: Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005 (Windows Vista capable and Windows Vista Premium ready)</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Dimensions: 9.28 inches, 12.98 inches, 1.47 inches (depth, width, thickness)</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Weight: 5.1 pounds, travel weight of 5.8 pounds with the adapter and battery</font></div>
	<div align="justify">
<table cellspacing="2" cellpadding="4" border="0">
<tr valign="top" align="left">
<td><font><img width="340" height="305" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/18623.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>The VAIO C packaging box (view large image)</em></font></td>
	<td valign="bottom"><font><img width="340" height="256" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/18625.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>Contents inside the box (view large image)</em></font></td>
</tr>
	<tr valign="top" align="left">
<td><font><img width="340" height="206" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/18627.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>Contents unwrapped (view large image)</em></font></td>
	<td><font><img width="340" height="212" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/18629.jpg" alt="" /><br />Screenshot of VAIO C desktop at first bootup (view large image)</font></td>
</tr>
</table>
	<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Build and Design</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>You have to hand it to Sony, they&#8217;ve done a nice job with the styling of the VAIO C and the selection of colors and designs is unprecedented. The Espresso Black with copper accents that comes with the C140 is sleek, cool and professional looking. The slightly dimpled finish on the keyboard and palm rests area is effective in making the notebook look more spritely. The pinhole sized LED indicator lights at the front of the notebook are attractive looking, albeit hard to read what they actually mean. The translucent power button is easy to find and also effective in making the VAIO C look more suave &#8212; I&#8217;m a sucker for nice looking power buttons.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="400" height="146" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/18603.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>Nice lights (view large image)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>The lid of the VAIO C also has a nice look, the silver VAIO badge is pleasong and the look is very clean.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="400" height="283" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/18605.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>VAIO C140 lid, the Sony logo is the front of the notebook &#8212; from this view it is upside down but when the lid is open it appears right-side up to onlookers (view large image)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>Build-wise the VAIO C is classified by Sony as a thin-and-light notebook. At 1.5&quot; of thickness it&#8217;s not exactly skinny, but it&#8217;s not as thick as one of those 2-inch thick 17&quot; screen notebook monsters. Honestly, I would have liked to have seen this notebook at 1.2&quot; of thickness. If you&#8217;re looking for a true thin and light weight 13.3&quot; screen notebook the Sony VAIO SZ is a better option, but much more expensive.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="440" height="233" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/18657.jpg" alt="" /><br />(view large image)</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><em><font>At 1.5&quot; of thickness the VAIO C isn&#8217;t exactly super model thin, it&#8217;s as thick as an 800 page paper back computer programming book</font></em></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="460" height="84" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/18659.jpg" alt="" /><br />(view large image)</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="460" height="139" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/18661.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>Notice that the VAIO C is quite a bit thicker than the larger screen but thinner 14.1&quot; ThinkPad T43 (view large image)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>The case of the VAIO C case is composed of plastic while the lid is some type of magnesium-alloy to offer better protection of the screen area. I was bracing myself for a dissapointingly cheap plastic case with a lot of flex to it, but to my pleasant surprise that&#8217;s not what I found. The VAIO C offers a very sturdy and relatively thick plastic casing. While the VAIO SZ offers a high-end carbon fiber build case that makes the SZ lighter, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a ton better in terms of sturdiness than the C. I stood in a Best Buy with a VAIO C next to a VAIO SZ and did my standard push and flex tests all over each notebook and found them to be about equal.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="460" height="235" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/18663.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>13.3&quot; Sony VAIO C on the left next to a 14.1&quot; screen ThinkPad T43 on the right (view large image)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>The VAIO C lid does not have a latch to hold it closed, which is a little disappointing to me, but once closed the lid does stay firmly down. The trick is opening it, you really have to use two hands and get one finger under the lid to lift it open. The hinge for the screen is very good, it is firm and holds the screen in place well &#8212; I even found the VAIO C to have a more convincing hinge mechanism than the somewhat wobbly VAIO SZ hinge.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>One knock against the VAIO C is that for the ExpressCard 34 slot Sony gives you a plastic dummy to fill the slot when it&#8217;s not in use, having a spring based flap would be preferable, removable plastic pieces are easily lost.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Performance and Benchmarks</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>The Core 2 Duo that comes with the VAIO C-series is no laggard in terms of performance, even at the 1.66GHz low-end we have configured. Having said that, the VAIO C is not being pushed by Sony as a portable performance machine as it does not offer a dedicated graphics option &#8212; that&#8217;s the realm of the VAIO SZ series. The 120GB hard drive provided does spin at 5400RPM, so that&#8217;s pretty decent. The two 512MB memory sticks included are 533MHz variety and Sony doesn&#8217;t even offer 667MHz memory if you configure a C190, surprising since the FSB on the Core 2 Duo can support speeds of up to 667MHz, so there may be a slight performance bottleneck there.</font></p>
&nbsp;</div>
</li>
</ul>
</span>&nbsp;</p>
<font><strong /></font>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laptopreview.blogsome.com/2007/09/11/sony-vaio-c-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell Latitude D630 Review</title>
		<link>http://laptopreview.blogsome.com/2007/09/11/dell-latitude-d630-review/</link>
		<comments>http://laptopreview.blogsome.com/2007/09/11/dell-latitude-d630-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Laptop Dell</category>
		<guid>http://laptopreview.blogsome.com/2007/09/11/dell-latitude-d630-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	The Latitude D630 is Dell&rsquo;s latest update to the D620, a light-weight business class machine. The Dell D630 comes with the very anticipated Santa Rosa platform but is visually the same as its predecessor. The machine starts at $899 (as of this writing) and most upgrades are reasonably priced.
	
D630 configuration:
	Dell Latitude D630 (view large image)
	

Processor: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p align="justify"><font><strong>The Latitude D630 is Dell&rsquo;s latest update to the D620, a light-weight business class machine. The Dell D630 comes with the very anticipated Santa Rosa platform but is visually the same as its predecessor. The machine starts at $899 (as of this writing) and most upgrades are reasonably priced.</strong></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><span><br />
<p align="justify"><strong><font>D630 configuration:</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="360" height="451" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/23352.jpg" /><br /><em>Dell Latitude D630 (<span>view large image</span>)</em></font></p>
	<ul>
<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Processor: Intel T7300 Core 2 Duo (2.0GHz, 800MHz FSB, 4MB Cache)</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Graphics: Intel GMA X3100</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Operating System: Windows Vista Business 32-bit</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Display: WXGA+ 1440 x 900 (matte)</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Hard Drive: 80GB 540RPM</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Memory: 512MB (512MB x 1), up to 4GB max</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Ports:</font></div>
	<ul>
<li>
<div align="justify"><font>4 - USB 2.0 (two in the back and two on the right)</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>FireWire (left)</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Security lock (left)</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Headphone out &amp; microphone in (left)</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>VGA out (back)</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>56k modem (back)</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Gigabit Ethernet (back)</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Power (back)</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Serial (back)</font></div>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Slots:</font></div>
	<ul>
<li>
<div align="justify"><font>1 PC Card Slot</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Smart Card Slot</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Docking station</font></div>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Optical Drive: DVD +/- RW</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Battery: 9-cell 85WHr</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Security: UPEK fingerprint reader</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Pointing device: Touchpad or Track Stick</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Intel 3945 WLAN (802.11a/g) mini Card</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Dell Wireless 360 Bluetooth Vista Module</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>USA keyboard</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Dimensions: 13.3&quot; x 9.37&quot; x 1.09 - 1.27&quot; (337mm x 238mm x 27.6 - 32.3mm)</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Weight: 5.1lbs with DVD drive and 6-cell, 5.8lbs with 9-cell, 6.6lbs with AC adaptor and 9-cell</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>3 Year warranty, In-Home Service, International</font></div>
</li>
</ul>
	<p align="justify"><font>Total Price As Configured: $1,372</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>Some of you are probably wondering as to why I chose so little RAM and a rather small hard drive. Like I said, most upgrades are reasonably priced. I purchased 2GB from Newegg for $80, Dell&rsquo;s upgrade would have been $200.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Reasons for buying</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>I&rsquo;m a college student majoring in International Business and IT. My previous machine, a HP dv4000 with the 12-cell monster-sized battery, was far too heavy (nearly 9 pounds with the AC adaptor) for me to carry in my backpack for 6 consecutive hours. I also travel quite a bit to visit family in Spain and need something to keep me occupied on the 12-hour (or more) plane trip.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>First Impression</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>I was surprised at how little there was in the box. Aside from the laptop and the charger, it only came with the OS, Roxio Creator 9, and application discs. The manual itself is rather useless. In fact, I would not even consider it a manual &#8230; it&#8217;s more like a caution and legal guide. I had to guess my way into getting started and it was frustrating because I have not used Vista until purchasing the D630. I&rsquo;m still stumbling with it.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="360" height="230" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/23354.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>The entire box &#8230; minus the box. (<span>view large image</span>)</em><br /></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Build and Design:</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>This thing feels like a tank and is extremely sturdy. The hinges on the machine are stiff but not difficult to open and the screen will not wobble. There is no flexing of the screen and you truly have to try to press the back to see ripples. When closed, a small, shiny hinge holds the screen locked. The top and bottom of the machine are made of magnesium. I still wouldn&rsquo;t recommend dropping the machine in order to test if the material is durable.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>The speakers are (I think) inside the laptop because I saw no openings for them. The battery sticks out in the front rather than the back. You are also able to add another battery to the DVD bay or replace the drive with something updated down the road. It is very simple to replace the drive in case something happens.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>I do have one complaint: I frequently use my USB slots and I dislike having the other two ports in the back. I prefer them on the side. The USB slots are also a bit stiff. Sometimes you have to try to jam the connector into the slot.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Layout</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>You will find most of the ports either on the left or the back of the laptop.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="440" height="114" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/23356.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>The left side. No Express Card for us this time (<span>view large image</span>)</em><br /></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="440" height="112" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/23358.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>The back of the machine including a serial port for old devices. (<span>view large image</span>)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="440" height="117" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/23360.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>The right side. Only a DVD Burner and two USB slots (<span>view large image</span>)</em><br /></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="400" height="175" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/23364.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>The machine is practically as thin as two decks of cards. (<span>view large image</span>)</em><br /></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Screen</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>Many people complained about the terrible brightness level of the D620. Unfortunately, I don&rsquo;t have a D620 to compare it to. I do, however, have a Viewsonic VX2025wm desktop monitor that has been color calibrated with a Spyder2 Suite. This seems like an apples to orange type of comparison but if I am to compare it, I must use something that has been in my possession for at least one full year. The added benefit is that this comparison shows how far the colors differ from a screen that has near-perfect color reproduction.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>I am happy to report the 14.1-inch, 1440x900 screen is surprisingly brighter than I expected. I was able to easily see it indoors with the sun behind me. This was tested with highest screen brightness level (8/8).</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="380" height="296" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/23366.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>The screen facing the sun while indoors. Easily readable. (<span>view large image</span>)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="380" height="395" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/23370.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>Outdoors but under a shady tree. More difficult to read but manageable. (<span>view large image</span>)</em><br /></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>Color accuracy and contrast, on the other hand, out of the box already left me disappointed. The best way to describe the contrast is a dark shirt that has been washed too many times. The horizontal viewing angles are very good but I can&rsquo;t say the same about the vertical ones. You have to stare directly at the screen or else there will be discoloration and distortion. There is a bit of light leakage at the bottom. If you truly want the best screen available, the best bet would be to wait until LED screens come out or hook the laptop up to a monitor.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="380" height="428" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/23372.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>Comparison between a color calibrated monitor and the D630. (<span>view large image</span>)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="380" height="253" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/23374.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>The front of the screen: the dark colors tend to look much richer in dark places. (<span>view large image</span>)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="380" height="166" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/23376.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>Top view of screen (<span>view large image</span>)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="380" height="227" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/23380.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>Bottom view (<span>view large image</span>)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="280" height="426" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/23382.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>Left view (<span>view large image</span>)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="280" height="405" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/23384.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>Right view (<span>view large image</span>)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="360" height="251" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/23386.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>D630 screen before color calibration (<span>view large image</span>)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="360" height="240" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/23388.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>D630 screen after calibration. This made a HUGE difference. (<span>view large image</span>)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Speakers</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>The speakers output at about two watts and are under the left palm (I could feel them vibrating). There are the quick mute and volume buttons on the top of the keyboard, all very handy to have. The speakers are loud &#8230; much louder than I expected. Depending on what is being played they might be able to fill a small room. Unfortunately, a loud speaker does not always equal quality output. At high and sometimes even medium levels distortions start occurring. Granted, this is a business machine that was primarily designed to just output warnings and the like. It&rsquo;s like Dell bought out all the extra Gameboy speakers and super sized them.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>If you like to listen to music, bring your own external speakers and possibly your own sound card.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Processor and Performance</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>CPU: My machine came equipped with the new Santa Rosa platform. Upgrades to the processor include a faster front-side bus and a new level of power state. According to an Intel rep (I used to work in retail), I was told these new chips are about 10-15 percent faster and equally consume less battery life than the previous Centrino generation. This will not, however, make minor application usage (office programs) run any faster. The design behind this is most likely for the battery use and people that need a faster processor (multimedia users).</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>HD: The hard drive is an 80GB SATA drive running at 5400RPM. My plan was to buy a 160GB drive and a notebook enclosure from Newegg, replace the 80GB drive, and convert the machine&rsquo;s original drive to a portable HD. Due to financial reasons, I did not go through with it. The faster transfer speed (higher density) and larger storage are nice ideas but we can&rsquo;t have everything.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>GPX: I&rsquo;ll be blunt, this machine was not built for gaming. Intel upgraded this generation&rsquo;s integrated graphics but it is still no match for a dedicated card. Essentially, the X3100 can run old games but don&rsquo;t expect F.E.A.R. or an equally graphically intensive game to be playable.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>RAM: If you wish to run multiple applications, get the 2GB. Vista recommends (read: needs) 1GB to run the OS and any other application(s) smoothly. Before I upgraded the machine with 2GB, it came with 512MB. It was crawling and nearly always accessing the hard drive (and consuming more battery in the process). After the upgrade to 2GB, it ran as smooth as a hot knife through butter. I needed 2GB because Photoshop is a huge memory hog. If you plan to use this machine for office use, 1GB will most likely be enough to accommodate your needs.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Benchmarks</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>To prove that this machine runs as good as I say, check the benchmarks. All benchmarks ran with the notebook plugged in. I made sure both the T61 and the D630 were next to each other on the tables for easier comparison. I was not surprised to see little difference between the D630 and the T61 (they are nearly identical notebooks).</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>Super Pi is a benchmark program that is small and tends to do a decent job of measuring processor and memory performance. For future reference I also benchmarked it with 4M and ended with a result of 2m 14s.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><em><font>Super Pi comparison results</font></em></p>
	<div align="justify">
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="4" border="1" style="width: 412px; height: 262px;">
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong><font>Notebook</font></strong></td>
	<td valign="top"><strong><font>Results (Time, 2M digits)</font></strong></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong><font>Dell Latitude D630 (2.00GHz Core 2 Duo Intel T7300)</font></strong></td>
	<td valign="top"><strong><font>59s</font></strong></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>Lenovo ThinkPad T61 (2.00GHz Core 2 Duo Intel T7300)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>59s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>HP dv2500t (1.80GHz Core 2 Duo Intel 7100)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>1m 09s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>Lenovo ThinkPad T60 (2.00GHz Core 2 Duo T7200)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>1m 03s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>Toshiba Satellite P205-S6287 (1.73 GHz Core 2 Duo Intel T5300)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>1m 24s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>HP Compaq 6515b (1.6GHz AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>2m 05s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>HP dv5000z (2.0GHz Sempron 3300+)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>2m 02s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>Samsung X60 (1.66GHz Core Duo)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>1m 29s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>IBM ThinkPad T43&nbsp;(1.86GHz&nbsp;Alviso Pentium M)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>1m 45s</font></td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
	<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
	<p align="justify"><font>PCMark05 is a synthetic benchmark that tests overall system performance. &nbsp;I also ran the application with 512MB of RAM and ended up with a score of 3,860 PCMarks. 4,020 PCMarks with 1GB and 4,084 PCMarks with 1.5GB. All the other benchmarks ran with 2GB of RAM.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><em><font>PCMark05 comparison results</font></em></p>
	<div align="justify">
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="4" border="1" style="width: 397px; height: 262px;">
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong><font>Notebook</font></strong></td>
	<td valign="top"><strong><font>PCMark05 Score</font></strong></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong><font>Dell Latitude D630 (2.00GHz Core 2 Duo Intel T7300, X3100)</font></strong></td>
	<td valign="top"><strong><font>4,169 PCMarks</font></strong></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>Lenovo ThinkPad T61 (2.00GHz Core 2 Duo Intel T7300, X3100)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>4,084 PCMarks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>HP dv2500t (1.80GHz Core 2 Duo T7100, Intel X3100 Graphics)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>3,376 PCMarks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>Lenovo T60 Widescreen (2.0 GHz Intel T7200, ATI X1400 128MB)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>4,189 PCMarks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>Toshiba Satellite P205-S6287 (Intel 1.73GHz T5300 + GMA 950)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>2,981 PCMarks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>HP Compaq 6515b (1.6GHz AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52, ATI x1270)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>2,420 PCMarks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>Alienware M7700 (AMD Athlon FX-60, Nvidia Go 7800GTX)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>5,597&nbsp;PCMarks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>Asus V6J (1.86GHz Core Duo T2400, Nvidia Go 7400)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>3,646 PCMarks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>Toshiba Tecra M6 (1.66GHz Intel T2300E, Intel GMA 950)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>2,732 PCMarks</font></td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
	<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
	<p align="justify"><font>3DMark05 is a synthetic benchmark that tests 3D graphics. A faster graphics card will NOT speed up 2D applications such as image editors, it is mostly used for playing games and doing 3D work, such as modeling or CAD.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><em><font>3DMark05 Comparison Results</font></em></p>
	<div align="justify">
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="4" border="1" style="width: 421px; height: 262px;">
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong><font>Notebook</font></strong></td>
	<td valign="top"><strong><font>3DMark05 Score</font></strong></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong><font>Dell Latitude D630 (2.00GHz Core 2 Duo Intel T7300, X3100)</font></strong></td>
	<td valign="top"><strong><font>915 3DMarks</font></strong></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>Lenovo ThinkPad T61 (2.00GHz Core 2 Duo Intel T7300)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>911 3DMarks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>Toshiba Satellite P205-S6287 (Intel 1.73GHz T5300 + GMA 950)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>559 3DMarks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>HP Compaq 6515b (1.6GHz AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52, ATI x1270)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>871 3DMarks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>Lenovo ThinkPad T60 (2.0GHz Core Duo, ATI X1400 128MB)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>2,092 3DMarks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>HP dv6000t (2.16 GHz Intel T7400, NVIDA GeForce Go 7400)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>2,013 3DMarks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>Dell Inspiron e1705 (2.0GHz Core Duo, ATI X1400)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>1,791 3DMarks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>Acer TravelMate 8204WLMi (2.0GHz Core Duo, ATI X1600 256MB)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>4,236 3DMarks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>Alienware Aurora M-7700 (AMD Dual Core FX-60, ATI X1600 256MB)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>7,078 3DMarks</font></td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
	<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
	<p align="justify"><font>3DMark06 is the updated version of 3DMark05, it is much more intensive than its predecessor. A benchmark of the T61 was not provided.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><em><font>3DMark06 Comparison Results</font></em></p>
	<div align="justify">
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="4" border="1" style="width: 441px; height: 236px;">
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong><font>Notebook</font></strong></td>
	<td valign="top"><strong><font>3DMark06 Score</font></strong></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong><font>Dell Latitude D630 (2.00GHz Core 2 Duo Intel T7300, X3100)</font></strong></td>
	<td valign="top"><strong><font>564 3DMarks</font></strong></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>HP dv2500t (1.80GHz Core 2 Duo T7100, Intel X3100 Graphics)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>541 3DMarks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>HP dv6000t (2.16 GHz Intel T7400, NVIDA GeForce Go 7400)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>827 3DMarks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>Samsung Q35 (1.83GHz Core 2 Duo T5600, Intel 945GM)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>106 3DMarks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>Samsung R20 (1.73GHz T2250 and ATI 1250M chipset/GPU)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>476 3DMarks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>Samsung X60plus (2.0GHz Core 2 Duo T7200, ATI X1700 256MB)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>1,831 3DMarks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>Asus A6J (1.83GHz Core Duo, ATI X1600 128MB)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>1,819 3DMarks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td valign="top"><font>Fujitsu Siemens Amilo Xi 1526 (1.66 Core Duo, nVidia 7600Go 256 MB)</font></td>
	<td valign="top"><font>2,144 3DMarks</font></td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
	<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
	<p align="justify"><em><font>VistaScore</font></em></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="400" height="165" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/23391.jpg" alt="" /><br />(<span>view large image</span>)</font></p>
	<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
	<p align="justify"><em><font>HD Tune &ndash; For comparison, a 100GB 7200RPM drive scored an average of 37.4MB/s</font></em></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="400" height="325" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/23393.jpg" alt="" /><br />(<span>view large image</span>)</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Heat and Noise</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>The machine is extremely quiet, the fan hardly goes into full blast, even with the CPU at 100 percent. When it does go all out, it is possible to hear it but it is whisper-quiet. The bottom gets warm but nothing that will scald someone&rsquo;s lap. Even so, I would not recommend having it sit on your lap for long hours, it could get uncomfortable.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Keyboard and Touchpad</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>The keyboard is pleasant to use but there is no way it can compare to a Lenovo keyboard. If you ever used a consumer line of laptops, that&rsquo;s what the keyboard feels like. All the keys are in the correct spot and the Ctrl key is on the left side of the Fn key.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="380" height="283" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/23362.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>The keyboard is very nice. I found very few faults with it (<span>view large image</span>)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>The Track Stick is somewhat awkward to use, it never seems to accurately point to I want it to. There are some interesting options, however. For example, you can set the machine to automatically disable both the Track Stick and/or the Touchpad (along with their respective buttons) when an external mouse is connected. One interesting option was to allow the Track Stick to click when it is tapped (much like a Touchpad).</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>The buttons feel sturdy and don&rsquo;t make a clicking sound when pressed. The Touchpad buttons feel somewhat small as I have the fingerprint reader.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Wireless</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>My machine came pre-equipped with the Intel 3945 Wireless card offering a/b/g wireless reception. I did not opt for the 802.11n because it is still in draft mode and the G reception will be around for a while. Chances are, when I get my next laptop (years from now), a new standard will be accepted for wireless and the N reception will be rendered obsolete.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>I was able to test the connection with my Linksys WRT54g router, a somewhat common router. I was able to go anywhere in the house and pick up a signal. No matter where I went, I could not get the laptop to drop the connection, I had to go outside and walk all the way towards the opposite side of my neighbor&rsquo;s yard to kill it. To put it in perspective, that is about 150 feet.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>My D630 came configured with Bluetooth. I tested it with my PDA and was able to synchronize it with no issues.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Battery</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>I need my machine to last as long as possible. I chose the nine-cell battery despite the fact it sticks out. I truly believe I made the right choice because this thing lasts a very long time. With Firefox, Office, Wi-Fi, and screen at max (8/8) the battery lasted (I ran it until the laptop shut off) an astounding <strong>5 hours and 15 minutes</strong>. Same test bed but no Wi-Fi landed me with <strong>5 hours and 45 minutes</strong>.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>I did not have enough time to test it with the screen at a medium level but Vista tells me I can safely say it can push a little over six hours with Wi-Fi. If you get the Media Bay battery to go along with the nine-cell, I would venture about 7.5 or more hours. Of course, this is assuming you are using it for lightweight programs and you have 1GB or more of RAM.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>At the bottom of the battery there is a button that allows you to check the battery level. It goes by five levels, giving you an estimate of how much charge is available. I consider it helpful because you don&rsquo;t need to turn the laptop on to check the battery level.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Operating System and Software</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>I ordered my machine with Windows Vista Business. The machine came with practically zero useless software. In fact, aside from the amazing bundled security software, it only comes with Roxio Creator 9 and Cyberlink PowerDVD 7. The only thing that I uninstalled was Google Desktop and Google Explorer Bar.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Security and others</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>The machine came bundled with a security package by Wave Systems. The software comes with a wizard that assists you in selecting what level of security you wish to implement. You are granted the option to ask for a password and /or fingerprint at boot-up. You can even encrypt the hard drive with the same password/fingerprint.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>Trying to make use of the fingerprint reader, I opted to prompt for my fingerprint at boot up. The interesting thing about this option would be that if you don&rsquo;t have either the password or a fingerprint, you cannot even access the BIOS. Essentially, if the laptop is stolen and if the BIOS is properly configured, the thief will have a hell of a time trying to access your data. Business users take note, if you tend to lose laptops, you must purchase this device. I&rsquo;ve heard one story too many about how company X lost a laptop with employee and/or other sensitive information.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>I tried setting the machine to go to sleep only to find out that it asked for both. Basically, if the laptop ever logs-off or goes to bed, you will be asked for both or either types of security, depending on your choice.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>Even though the machine is externally very well protected, there are very few firewall programs for Vista. The one bundled with Vista is pretty useless. Just be careful checking important information on an unprotected connection; common sense, people.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Warranty and Customer Support</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>I chatted with Dell customer support several times to get a feel for the support they would provide. I am extremely happy to report all the customer support reps that I talked with were very knowledgeable. They all answered my questions without hesitation and correctly, all are very polite if you too are polite. The longest I was on hold was for five minutes.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>I&rsquo;ve heard of horror stories from the consumer line of Dell but the business line is unbelievably good. I know I made the right choice by paying for the $100 for in-home service. If some of you are more &ldquo;butterfingered,&rdquo; get the Complete Care package.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Upgrading</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>Upgrading the machine was an interesting journey. The machine originally came with a stick of 512MB and it was upgraded to a matched pair of 1GB sticks (2GB total).</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>The RAM slots are in two places, under the keyboard and under the laptop. I decided to start with the most difficult, under the keyboard. Let me warn you right here, it was difficult for me to do it and I&rsquo;ve built more computers than I have fingers and toes. I had to remove the hinge, which felt like it could crack at any given second, followed by the keyboard. After many sweaty but careful minutes, I was able to replace the RAM. The other slot, on the other hand, was extremely easy: one screw and I was done.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="360" height="240" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/23395.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>Removing the hinge to get to RAM slot (<span>view large image</span>)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="360" height="240" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/23397.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>Hinge removed (<span>view large image</span>)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="360" height="240" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/23399.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>Access to memory slot (<span>view large image</span>)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>To make a long story short, the computer didn&#8217;t boot up at first after my do-it-yourself upgrade and after calling tech support I thought I might have to purchase a new $350 motherboard. Luckily, the RAM just needed to be seated properly. I could have saved time and avoided a great deal of stress by ordering the RAM from Dell.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Conclusion</font></strong></p>
</span><span><br />
<p align="justify"><font>The short time spent with the laptop was enjoyable. Would I still order from Dell? Without a doubt, but this time I would pick the machine to be bundled with 2GB and forget about this moronic idea of saving money. There are some things I wish could have been included or modified but the </font><a href="http://www.notebookreview.com/price/default.asp?productID=19209&#038;productFamilyID=945&#038;display=priceDetail" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;"><font>Latitude D630</font></a><font> is a solid machine that I would recommend to anyone.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Pros</font></strong></p>
	<ul>
<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Extremely sturdy design and feel</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Amazing security software</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Bright screen</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Great battery life</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Awesome overall performance</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>System tends to run cool and quiet</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Excellent customer support</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Practically zero bloatware</font></div>
</li>
</ul>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Cons</font></strong></p>
	<ul>
<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Somewhat expensive upgrades</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Sound quality</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Contrast ratio could be better</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Not a Lenovo keyboard</font></div>
</li>
</ul>
	<p align="right"><font>Source: Notebookreview</font></p>
</span>&nbsp;</p>
<font><strong /></font>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laptopreview.blogsome.com/2007/09/11/dell-latitude-d630-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toshiba Satellite A135 Review</title>
		<link>http://laptopreview.blogsome.com/2007/09/11/toshiba-satellite-a135-review/</link>
		<comments>http://laptopreview.blogsome.com/2007/09/11/toshiba-satellite-a135-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Laptop Toshiba</category>
		<guid>http://laptopreview.blogsome.com/2007/09/11/toshiba-satellite-a135-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	The Toshiba A135 series notebook is offered in a wide variety of configurations, and ranges in price, at common big-box and online resellers, from under $700 to nearly $1500.
	
The particular model under review here, an A135-S4427 provided by Toshiba, falls near the lower end of this range, and at first glance appears to be an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><font><strong>The Toshiba A135 series notebook is offered in a wide variety of configurations, and ranges in price, at common big-box and online resellers, from under $700 to nearly $1500.</strong></font></p>
	<p><span><br />
<p align="justify"><font>The particular model under review here, an A135-S4427 provided by Toshiba, falls near the lower end of this range, and at first glance appears to be an excellent choice for the value-minded consumer looking to obtain a nicely outfitted notebook. The S4427 comes with Vista Home Premium, an Intel Core Duo T2250 processor, one gigabyte of RAM, 120 gigabytes of hard drive space, and a DVD-SuperMulti drive, all for well under $1000. Although a stripped-down Celeron configuration will generally cost the least of any A135 model notebook, the S4427, for not a whole lot more money, and provides just about everything one might hope for in a non-gaming, consumer-oriented notebook.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><br /></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>While comparing the prices of various A135s, I actually found myself thinking that this particular Toshiba series really is exemplary when it comes to illustrating the somewhat confusing task of pricing and purchasing a notebook. Yes, it&rsquo;s possible to save some money by going with a weak CPU and minimal RAM, but unless an extra 15 or 20% cost is truly prohibitive, it almost never makes sense to purchase the weakest model in a series. Conversely, from the perspective of value, it rarely makes sense to opt for one of the most expensive models within a particular line. In the case of the A135, it&rsquo;s possible to spend nearly double what an S4427 would cost, but from my perspective, an upgrade to the Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 and twice as much RAM and hard drive space is not worth the very substantial jump in price. In short, the exact review model I received, the A135-S4427, is probably the exact model I would myself purchase if I were in the market for a solid notebook that should have no trouble handling general office and multimedia tasks. My only concern, at the outset of this review, was whether or not Vista Home Premium, running the Aero interface, would be hampered by a single gigabyte of RAM. I&rsquo;m glad to say, with some elaboration below, that performance was always quite good, and that the addition of an inexpensive flash drive to make use of the Vista ReadyBoost feature offered some performance improvement in certain high-stress situations.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Toshiba Satellite A135-S4427 Specs:</font></strong></p>
	<ul>
<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Processor: Intel Core Duo T2250 (1.73 GHz/2MB L2 Cache)</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>OS: Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Hard Drive: 120 GB SATA @ 5400RPM</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Screen: 15.4&quot; WXGA TruBrite Widescreen (1280 x 800)</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Graphics: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950, Up To 224 MB Shared</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>RAM: 1GB DDR2 SDRAM @533 MHz (2x512MB)</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Optical Drive: DVD SuperMulti Drive (CD/DVD burner)</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Battery: 6-cell lithium ion</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Wireless: Intel PRO/Wireless 3945 802.11 a/b/g</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Weight: 6 lbs.</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Dimensions: 1.47&rdquo; (H) x 14.2 &ldquo; (W) x 10.5&quot; (D)&nbsp;</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Ports/Slots: 1 IEEE 1394 (FireWire); 4 Universal Serial Bus (USB 2.0); VGA monitor out port; S-video out; RJ-45 Ethernet LAN; RJ-11 modem; Type I/II PC Card Slot; headphone/speaker jack; microphone; 5-in-1 bridge media adapter supports Secure Digital, Multi Media Card, Memory Stick, Memory Stick PRO and xD Picture Card; Secure Digital slot supports SDIO</font></div>
</li>
</ul>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>First Impressions</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="360" height="386" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/20537.jpg" alt="" /><br />(<span>view large image</span>)</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>My first thought upon seeing the A135-S4427 was that it&rsquo;s a pretty standard consumer notebook: nothing exceptional in terms of appearance or build quality, just a lot of black and silver plastic. In all ways, the A135 occupies the middle ground and seems to be the equal of its competitors.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Design and Build</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="360" height="285" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/20535.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>Satellite A135 lid view (<span>view large image</span>)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>As indicated, design and build are unremarkable. I have no problem with the look, dependent as it is on offering decent form and function at a reasonable price. The build quality, like most consumer notebooks, seems fine too. I would have no concerns purchasing an A135 for myself because I travel minimally and tend to treat my computers with a care I rarely afford my other possessions. As always, an especially demanding or careless notebook user is probably better off looking at some of the more solidly built business models, though this inevitably means spending more money.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="450" height="58" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/20549.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>Satellite A135 front side: speaker and headphone jack, volume dial, 5-in-1 card reader, wi-fi on off switch (<span>view large image</span>)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="450" height="96" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/20551.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>Satellite A135 left side: VGA monitor out port, fant vent, USB port, S-Video, PCMCIA slot, FireWire port (<span>view large image</span>)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="450" height="122" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/20553.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>Satellite A135 right side: 2 USB 2.0 ports, optical drive, Kensington lock slot (<span>view large image</span>)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="450" height="93" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/20547.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>Satellite A135 back view: Modem, power jack, Ethernet LAN port and USB port (<span>view large image</span>)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>The screen</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="360" height="262" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/20539.jpg" alt="" /><br />(<span>view large image</span>)</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>The LG.Philips-manufactured display, a glossy TruBrite in the Toshiba lexicon, provides a resolution of 1280x800 and presented no problems at all. In fact, the screen was excellent. Had I purchased this notebook for long-term, personal use, I would have been quite happy with the LCD. There is no discernible light leakage and everything looks sharp and clear.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="360" height="285" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/20541.jpg" /><br />(<span>view large image</span>)</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Graphics</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="360" height="271" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/20543.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>Satellite A135 running Vista Aero (<span>view large image</span>)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>My main concern with the graphics was whether the GMA 950 could adequately handle the new Vista Aero interface. In the end, I was pleasantly surprised: the look was very nice, and whatever system RAM was being utilized by graphics, this siphoning off of physical memory never seemed to cause any significant lag. Everything worked in pleasant harmony. As indicated by the 3DMark05 and 3dMark06 scores below, this is no gaming machine, but it does what it sets out to do and does it well.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Sound</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>Two speakers situated just above the function keys provided adequate sound that was reasonably clear and loud for a notebook. There is a volume wheel on the front of the notebook, which is handy, and overall I had no complaints about sound. I watched, and enjoyed, a lengthy DVD without benefit of external speakers or headphones.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Processor and Performance</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>The Intel Core Duo T2250 CPU, together with GMA 950 graphics and a gigabyte of RAM, performed surprisingly well. After reading a few articles on the demands of Windows Vista, especially when the Aero interface is enabled, I really wondered if a gig of RAM and integrated graphics would result in poor performance. In the end, performance was surprisingly strong, with and without ReadyBoost flash memory added to the hardware mix. Much of what I say here is somewhat anecdotal, though I did run Super PI and PCMark05 with and without a ReadyBoost allocation. The results didn&rsquo;t vary much, but PCMark05 did indicate an overall performance increase of 3% with ReadyBoost enabled. I also noticed a difference between ReadyBoost and non-ReadyBoost performance while running Super PI in the background for an extended period of time; it seemed that various applications (Internet Explorer, Word, Notepad, Everest Home) responded and came to the fore much more quickly when flash memory was available to ReadyBoost. One final word on the CPU: some people may be put off by the inclusion of the older Core Duo in this particular model, but for most purposes, for the foreseeable future, the T2250 seems good enough and I for one wouldn&rsquo;t hesitate to buy a machine with a T2250, particularly given the overall performance of this A135-S4427.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Benchmarks</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><span><em><font>Super Pi Comparison Results</font></em></span></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>Super Pi forces the processor to calculate Pi to 2 million digits of accuracy and gives an idea of the processor speed and performance:<br /></font></p>
	<div align="justify">
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="4" border="1">
<tr>
<td><strong><font>Notebook</font></strong></td>
	<td><strong><font>Time</font></strong></td>
</tr>
	<tr valign="top" align="left">
<td><font>Toshiba Satellite A135 (1.73GHz Core Duo)</font></td>
	<td><strong><font>1m 28s</font></strong></td>
</tr>
	<tr valign="top" align="left">
<td><span><font>Fujitsu&nbsp;LifeBook N6410&nbsp;(1.66 GHz Core Duo)</font></span></td>
	<td><font>1m 22s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>LG S1 (2.16 GHz Core Duo)</font></td>
	<td><font>1m 11s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>Dell Inspiron e1505 (2.0GHz Core Duo)</font></td>
	<td><font>1m 16s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>Lenovo ThinkPad T60 (2.0GHz Core Duo)</font></td>
	<td><font>1m 18s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>Toshiba Satellite M100 (2.00GHz Core Duo)</font></td>
	<td><font>1m 18s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>Samsung X60 (1.66GHz Core Duo)</font></td>
	<td><font>1m 29s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>Sony VAIO FS680 (1.86 GHz Pentium M)</font></td>
	<td><font>1m 53s</font></td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
	<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
	<p align="justify"><span><em><font>Comparison results for 3DMark05</font></em></span></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>3DMark05 tests the overall graphic capabilities of a notebook, below is how the Satellite A135-4427 did compared to other notebooks:</font></p>
	<div align="justify">
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="4" border="1" style="width: 424px; height: 210px;">
<tr>
<td><strong><em><font>Notebook</font></em></strong></td>
	<td><strong><em><font>3D Mark 05 Results</font></em></strong></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>Toshiba Satellite A135 (1.73GHz Core Duo, Intel GMA 950)</font></td>
	<td><strong><font>519 3D Marks</font></strong></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>Alienware Aurora M-7700(AMD Dual Core FX-60, ATI X1600 256MB)</font></td>
	<td><font>7,078 3D Marks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>Lenovo ThinkPad T60 (2.0GHz Core Duo, ATI X1400 128MB)</font></td>
	<td><font>2,092 3D Marks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>Asus V6Va (2.13 GHz Pentium M, ATI x700 128 MB)</font></td>
	<td><font>2,530 3D Marks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>Fujitsu n6410 (1.66 GHz Core Duo, ATI X1400 128MB)</font></td>
	<td><font>2,273 3DMarks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>HP Pavilion dv4000 (1.86 GHz Pentium M, ATI X700 128MB)</font></td>
	<td><font>2,536 3D Marks</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>Dell XPS M1210 (2.16 GHz Core Duo, nVidia Go 7400 256MB)</font></td>
	<td><font>2,090 3D Marks</font></td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
	<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
	<p align="justify"><font>The score obviously indicates this notebook won&#8217;t do for more demanding 3D graphical needs such as gaming, but with 1GB of RAM Vista Aero still ran fine.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><em><font>PCMark05</font></em></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>I used PCMark05, a general system benchmarking tool, to compare results when the notebook had a 2GB USB flash drive available for the Vista ReadyBoost feature and when it didn&#8217;t. This Vista ReadyBoost feature allows the system to use a flash drive like extra memory, according to these benchmarks the flash drive did allow Vista to run faster, although marginally:</font></p>
	<div align="justify">
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="4" border="1" style="width: 435px; height: 630px;">
<tr valign="top" align="left">
<td><strong><font>PCMark05 Results</font></strong></td>
	<td><strong><font>Without ReadyBoost</font></strong></td>
	<td><strong><font>With 1.6 GB ReadyBoost Flash Memory</font></strong></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>Overall PCMark05 Score</font></td>
	<td><strong><font>2,937</font></strong></td>
	<td valign="top" align="left"><strong><font>3,027</font></strong></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>HDD &ndash; XP Startup</font></td>
	<td><font>5.2 MB/s</font></td>
	<td valign="top" align="left"><font>5.9 MB/s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>Physics and 3D</font></td>
	<td><font>63.95 FPS</font></td>
	<td valign="top" align="left"><font>63.66 FPS</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>Transparent Windows</font></td>
	<td><font>2965.92 Windows/s</font></td>
	<td valign="top" align="left"><font>2945.22 Windows/s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>3D &ndash; Pixel Shader</font></td>
	<td><font>8.56 FPS</font></td>
	<td valign="top" align="left"><font>8.51 FPS</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>Web Page Rendering</font></td>
	<td><font>1.19 Pages/s</font></td>
	<td valign="top" align="left"><font>1.24 Pages/s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>File Decryption</font></td>
	<td><font>42.94 MB/s</font></td>
	<td valign="top" align="left"><font>42.31 MB/s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>Graphics Memory &ndash; 64 Lines</font></td>
	<td><font>208.46 FPS</font></td>
	<td valign="top" align="left"><font>207.82 FPS</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>HDD &ndash; General Usage</font></td>
	<td><font>3.73 MB/s</font></td>
	<td valign="top" align="left"><font>5.55 MB/s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>Multithreaded Test 1 / Audio Compression</font></td>
	<td><font>1516.3 KB/s</font></td>
	<td valign="top" align="left"><font>1547.12 KB/s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>Multithreaded Test 1 / Video Encoding</font></td>
	<td><font>244.49 KB/s</font></td>
	<td valign="top" align="left"><font>220.19 KB/s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>Multithreaded Test 2 / Text Edit</font></td>
	<td><font>72.26 Pages/s</font></td>
	<td valign="top" align="left"><font>70.5 Pages/s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>Multithreaded Test 2 / Image Decompression</font></td>
	<td><font>19.99 Mpixels/s</font></td>
	<td valign="top" align="left"><font>18.12 MPixels/s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>Multithreaded Test 3 / File Compression</font></td>
	<td><font>3.43 MB/s</font></td>
	<td valign="top" align="left"><font>3.33 MB/s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>Multithreaded Test 3 / File Encryption</font></td>
	<td><font>20.17 MB/s</font></td>
	<td valign="top" align="left"><font>19.95 MB/s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>Multithreaded Test 3 / HDD &ndash; Virus Scan</font></td>
	<td><font>31.65 MB/s</font></td>
	<td valign="top" align="left"><font>39.78 MB/s</font></td>
</tr>
	<tr>
<td><font>Multithreaded Test 3 / Memory Latency &ndash; Random 16 MB</font></td>
	<td><font>7.24 Maccesses/s</font></td>
	<td valign="top" align="left"><font>7.05 Maccesses/s</font></td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
	<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
	<p align="justify"><font>You can see that with 1.6 GB flash memory allocated to ReadyBoost, the score was 3027, about 3% higher, with most of the gains appearing in areas where the hard drive would be under stress.</font></p>
	<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
	<p align="justify"><em><font>HDTune</font></em></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>Hard drive performance, using HD Tune as the measure, was as follows:</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="400" height="320" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/20555.jpg" alt="" /><br />(<span>view large image</span>)</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Input Devices</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="380" height="280" border="0" src="http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/20545.jpg" alt="" /><br /><em>Satellite A135 keyboard view (<span>view large image</span>)</em></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>Of the two fairly minor complaints I had about this notebook, the keyboard was one of them, though I am admittedly rather picky about keyboards. I prefer the Windows key to be located at the bottom of the keyboard, next to the control key, but Toshiba put this key at the top of the keyboard, to the right of the function keys. Also, the tab key is narrower than I&rsquo;m accustomed to, and all of these little keyboard eccentricities seem to result from the inclusion of a media button panel to the left of the keyboard (couldn&#8217;t they be at the top?), though maybe it&rsquo;s justified by design reasons I&rsquo;m unaware of. I did notice some flex in the keyboard as well, though I never found this to be a significant problem or detraction from my overall typing experience. The touchpad was fine, but I generally used a USB mouse. On the whole, I found input devices to be okay, with no really serious problems, but the keyboard did leave a little to be desired when compared to some other notebooks I&rsquo;ve used.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><strong>Battery</strong> <strong>Life</strong></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>The 6-cell battery allowed me to watch a complete DVD, lasting 1 hour and 48 minutes, and still had 22% charge remaining. During general usage, the battery lasted for two hours and fifteen minutes, with minimal effort to reduce power consumption.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Heat and Noise</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>Generally the A135 did well in terms of heat and noise. The notebook was fairly quiet and stayed reasonably cool, with the bottom and palm rests never getting very warm at all. The fan did come on rather frequently, though it generally ceased spinning within a couple of seconds. But I did notice this regular, rapid cycling on and off, which often seemed to occur every few seconds. Another thing I found somewhat disconcerting was a regular blast of warm air coming out of the side vent, located on the left, whenever the fan did turn on. If it weren&rsquo;t for the fact that I operate the mouse with my left hand, and I do generally use an external mouse, I might never have noticed the warm gush of air. But I found myself almost unconsciously shortening my left arm in order to avoid the warm air. I would guess that these are the sorts of issues that wouldn&rsquo;t bother some users at all, but may drive a small selection of people absolutely batty.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Wireless</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>The Intel PRO/Wireless 3945 worked without any problems, though setup took me a little longer than normal because I wasn&rsquo;t used to the new Vista configuration drill.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Software</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>Yes, there was a great deal of junk software on the A135, just as I&rsquo;ve come to expect, and I didn&rsquo;t bother uninstalling most of it. Nonetheless, performance was good, surprisingly so, as I&rsquo;ve mentioned, given that I always ran the notebook with Aero enabled. Everything I tried to do I could do without any problems: general business-type tasks, DVD watching, listening to music, surfing the Internet.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>As for Vista, the A135 afforded me my first extensive use of the new OS, though I&rsquo;d installed a beta version of Vista on a desktop last year. Just about the first thing I did was turn off the new User Account Control (UAC) feature, which was driving me nuts. Once that was done and Windows quit asking me to confirm every other thing I tried to do, I found it took a couple of hours to get used to the differences between XP and Vista. The new interface is quite appealing, and Vista, in general, handled everything I asked of it with the same equanimity I&rsquo;d become accustomed to with XP.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Conclusion</font></strong></p>
	<p align="justify"><font><br /></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>At the right price, and with the right configuration, the </font><a href="http://www.notebookreview.com/price/default.asp?productFamilyID=936&#038;display=priceDetail" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;"><font>Satellite A135</font></a><font> offers extraordinary value. It is a fully capable notebook computer and performs better than I expected after reading various articles on the demands of Windows Vista. Toshiba has managed, at least in the S4427 incarnation of the A135, to provide a good CPU and screen, a full gig of RAM, a nice-sized hard drive, Vista Home Premium and an excellent optical drive, all for a very low price.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>I wouldn&rsquo;t hesitate to recommend this notebook to someone looking to buy a notebook for general office and multimedia tasks while keeping the price low and avoiding serious sacrifices in terms of performance and components. Given that most people are capable of adjusting to a couple of keyboard eccentricities, my only real caveat would have to do with the fan cycling on and off and the blast of warm air that might bother a left-handed mouse user. Are these problems serious? I really don&rsquo;t think so, but everyone&rsquo;s tolerance for such things is different, as is a person&rsquo;s tolerance for paying double or triple to get a computer that seems nearly perfect. As it is, at the most recent weekend&rsquo;s sale prices at the usual big-box and online retailers, this notebook is as good a value as I&rsquo;ve ever seen. I never felt like I was using a machine that made serious trade-offs in order to keep the price down.</font></p>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Pros:</font></strong></p>
	<ul>
<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Exceptional value</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Very good multimedia machine</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Excellent screen</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Decent build quality</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Reasonably appealing appearance</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>On the whole, stays very cool</font></div>
</li>
</ul>
	<p align="justify"><strong><font>Cons:</font></strong></p>
	<ul>
<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Keyboard layout may take some getting used to</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Some flex in keyboard</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Fan tends to cycle on and off</font></div>
</li>
	<li>
<div align="justify"><font>Warm air blows out of left vent and onto the hand of a left-handed mouse user</font></div>
</li>
</ul>
	<p align="right"><font>Source: Notebookreview</font></p>
</span>&nbsp;</p>
<font><strong /></font>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laptopreview.blogsome.com/2007/09/11/toshiba-satellite-a135-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lenovo Announces Widescreen ThinkPad T60</title>
		<link>http://laptopreview.blogsome.com/2007/09/11/lenovo-announces-widescreen-thinkpad-t60/</link>
		<comments>http://laptopreview.blogsome.com/2007/09/11/lenovo-announces-widescreen-thinkpad-t60/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Laptop IBM</category>
		<guid>http://laptopreview.blogsome.com/2007/09/11/lenovo-announces-widescreen-thinkpad-t60/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	 		    Today, Lenovo announced the availability of the ThinkPad T60 Widescreen, the company&#8217;s first widescreen T-Series notebook. The T60&#8217;s 15.4-inch display is designed to improve the productivity of mobile professionals by offering more onscreen real estate for spreadsheet columns and video presentations.
	The notebook fits 30 percent more data onscreen than its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p align="justify"> 		    <font><strong>Today, Lenovo announced the availability of the ThinkPad T60 Widescreen, the company&#8217;s first widescreen T-Series notebook. The T60&#8217;s 15.4-inch display is designed to improve the productivity of mobile professionals by offering more onscreen real estate for spreadsheet columns and video presentations.</strong></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>The notebook fits 30 percent more data onscreen than its 14-inch predecessor, the ThinkPad T60. But the ThinkPad T60 Widescreen notebook features more than just a new display; this 5.1-pound notebook also includes a 2.3 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor, an estimated six hours of battery life, up to a 160GB hard drive, a choice of integrated Intel graphics or higher-end ATI graphics, and an optional WSXGA+ display. <br /></font></p>
	<div align="justify"> </div>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="420" border="0" src="http://laptopmag.com/NR/rdonlyres/ekluasjt35dhnlosua23wjb27zyhmpqxsh3hdekthl6koazpaj6mmxndcdmghgoisx33sxhtcuqtpa/lenovoT60p1.jpg" /></font></p>
	<div align="justify"> </div>
	<p align="justify"><font><br />Wireless options include integrated 3G WAN (on either Cingular&#8217;s or Verizon&#8217;s high-speed network), 802.11n Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and Infrared wireless technologies. Lenovo&#8217;s ThinkVantage technology helps users easily connect to the Internet as they switch between wired and wireless connections. The notebooks are also available in Vista Capable and Vista Premium Ready models, in preparation for the release of Microsoft&#8217;s new operating system. </p>
	<p>Those concerned about durability will be happy to learn that the ThinkPad T60 Widescreen features Lenovo&#8217;s Active Protection System and a spill-resistant keyboard for protecting the notebook from bumps and spills. For the security-minded, the notebook contains the latest Lenovo security tools, such as the Embedded Security System and an optional fingerprint reader for keeping unauthorized eyes away from confidential data.<br />&nbsp; </font></p>
	<div align="justify"> </div>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="420" border="0" src="http://laptopmag.com/NR/rdonlyres/e2qcrwr2pwmxm7entftkf75qwmvs2enlkhhxviaov5ubsv5sodhe4lqo5rv6yzoxleno3mnpt64gdd/lenovoT60.jpg" /></font></p>
	<div align="justify"> </div>
	<p align="justify"><font>Price: </font><a href="http://www.thongtinlaptop.com/module/news/viewcontent.asp?page=3"><font color="#0033ff">Starting at $1,399</font></a><br /><font>Info: </font><a href="http://www.lenovo.com/us/en"><font color="#0033ff">http://www.lenovo.com/us/en</font></a></p>
	<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
<font><strong /></font>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laptopreview.blogsome.com/2007/09/11/lenovo-announces-widescreen-thinkpad-t60/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lenovo ThinkPad X60 Tablet Is Worth a Second Look</title>
		<link>http://laptopreview.blogsome.com/2007/09/11/hello-world/</link>
		<comments>http://laptopreview.blogsome.com/2007/09/11/hello-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 02:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Laptop IBM</category>
		<guid>http://laptopreview.blogsome.com/2007/09/11/hello-world/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	If you&#8217;re someone who thinks Tablets PCs are only for a niche group that you&#8217;re not a part of, think again. The latest Tablet from Lenovo is designed with all notebook users in mind, and it just may be the best convertible yet.
	Now sporting a faster, 1.8-GHz Core Duo processor among other improved hardware, such [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p align="justify"><font><strong>If you&#8217;re someone who thinks Tablets PCs are only for a niche group that you&#8217;re not a part of, think again. The latest Tablet from Lenovo is designed with all notebook users in mind, and it just may be the best convertible yet.</strong></font></p>
	<p align="justify"><font>Now sporting a faster, 1.8-GHz Core Duo processor among other improved hardware, such as larger hard drives and more memory, the 4.2-pound X60 is also claiming up to nine hours of battery life. <br /></font></p>
	<div align="justify"> </div>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="400" border="0" src="http://laptopmag.com/NR/rdonlyres/ebtrloyzdzl3blwzmubuzngulap6bloyndn6knnppxc3wwbnlgb6ox67ws6ziddh5z2kwg3scu2dfi/lenovothinkpadx60p1.jpg" /></font></p>
	<div align="justify"> </div>
	<p align="justify"><font><br />You can get the X60 Tablet with one of two displays: a high-resolution SXGA+ model that automatically rotates depending on how you hold the system, and an outdoor-readable touchscreen that works with your finger or the improved pen (now with an eraser). </p>
	<p>For staying connected anywhere, the X60 can be configured with Sprint EV-DO or Cingular HSDPA mobile broadband. It also comes equipped with next-generation 802.11n technology. And staying true to its ThinkPad roots, the X60 allows you to stay comfortable while you compute with the legendary ThinkPad full-sized keyboard and a new NavDial that can be used in Tablet mode.&nbsp;<br />&nbsp;</font></p>
	<div align="justify"> </div>
	<p align="justify"><font><img width="420" border="0" src="http://laptopmag.com/NR/rdonlyres/ednui23el23l6bveqslgpp33jb4w6rkvlc46mxx3socawkm2fcx3hj45pf5qiutcvyp3tpzr4xbxjo/lenovothinkpadx60.jpg" /></font></p>
<font><strong /></font>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laptopreview.blogsome.com/2007/09/11/hello-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
